THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROGRAM





    Untouched Lophophora williamsii within the regrowth study site


        
      Peyote post-harvest regrowth –
      Late harvest group.
      Summary of our observations in 2011.

        PNF – Plant not found.
            TNF – Tag not found.
             nd   – No data.
               –    – Missing data.


        Concerning data on regrowth involving multiple pups:
            1) There is not necessarily a direct 1:1 correspondence between sequential figures for individual pups within a single plant.
            2) It was not uncommon for some or all pups to be partly or entirely covered with soil so some photos may reflect the pre-uncovery state.

            Images of the tags can be viewed via the links for the tag numbers and images of the actual plants can be viewed using the links in the columns headed "Regrowth as number of pups".

            The following 20 plants (#201-220) were harvested during the November 2008 monitoring to make up for what were then believed to be lost plants from the original group of 50 harvested individuals. The March 2009 data below followed a severe drought that lasted throughout the winter and into the spring, up through the date of the March monitoring.

        Late harvest adjunct group.


         Plant No. 
        Tag IMG
         2009
        2010
        2011
         Regrowth as  
         number of pups 
        or
        PNF/NP
         Diameter of pups 
        (cm)
            7 March 2009
           6 March 2010
         15 March 2011
           Comments   


         
         
        201
        201
        201
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        2.2, 1.2
        2.3, 1.5

        202
        202
        202
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        2.3, 2.1
        3.0, 3.0

           Larger 3rd crown that was present is a sister to the harvested plant.
         
        203
        203
        203
        0
        3
        3
        nd
        2.5, 1.5, 1.5
        3.5, 3.0, 4.0

        204
        204
        204
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        2.8, 1.9
        4.0, 2.6

        205
        205
        205
        0
        0
        0
        nd
        nd
        nd


            Carcass found.
        206
        206
        206
        1
        1
        0
        2.0
        1.8x1.0
        nd
           See Note following table. 
           Crown mostly eaten; fragmentary remains.
            No sign remaining.
        207
        207
        207
        0
        2
        1
        nd
        3.0, 2.0
        4.2

        208
        208
        208
        PNF
        PNF
        PNF
        nd
        nd
        nd
            Evidently uprooted by feral hogs. 
            Hogs. 
            Stake was dug up by hogs. 
        209
        209
        209
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        2.5, 1.6
        4.0, 2.8

        210
        210
        210
        0
        1
        1
        nd
         3.3
         3.8

           Plant mistakenly thought dead in 2009 causing missed data.   
           Sister of the harvested plant is still alive.   
        211
        211
        211
        0
        0
        1
        nd
        nd
        4.2

           Sister of the harvested plant is still alive. 
         
        212
        212
        212
        0
        0
        0
        nd
        nd
        nd


           New seedling found nearby (5 mm dia.); not part of study group.
        213
        213
        (213)
        213
        0
        nd
        (1)
        0
        nd
        nd
        (nd)
        nd

           Hog activity evident. 
        (Entry updated: 2010 July 26.)
           No carcass located.
        214
        214
        214
        0
        4
        4
        nd
         1.8, 1.5, 1.0. 0.5
        2.7, 1.3, 2.0, 2.7


           One crown stepped on.
        215
        215
        215
        0
        1
        2
        nd
        3.0
        3.5, 5.0

           Unharvested twin also present.  

        216
        216
        216
        0
        2
        1
        nd
        1.1, 1.5
        0.8


           Almost dead. Dry.
        217
        217
        217
        0
        3
        3
        nd
        1.5, 1.9, 1.0
        3.2, 2.8, 2.5


           Smallest one somewhat chewed on.
        218
        218
        218
        0
        0
        1
        nd
        nd
        2.2

           Sister of the harvested plant is still alive.
           Twin is still alive and well.
        219
        219
        219
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        2.5, 2.9
        4.0, 3.5

        220
        220
        220
        0
        2
        2
        nd
        3.0, 2.5
        3.4, 3.6


           No rebar. Nail uprooted; moved ~30 cm from plant.




            The data summary for the primary regrowth group.

            The data summary for the control group.



        Regrowth study site showing typical Tamaulipan thornscrub vegetation

           

            If you would like to help support additional studies of this type, designed to answer basic questions that are critical to the optimal stewardship/management of vulnerable cactus species, please send a contribution, of $25 USD or whatever amount you can afford, to the Cactus Conservation Institute, 909 E. Sul Ross Ave., Alpine, TX 79830.
            We also now accept donations via PayPal.






    Please enjoy our featured articles:


    A Tale of Two Cacti


    by Dana M. Price & Martin Terry



    Button, button, who's got the button?


    by Martin Terry


    Conservation of Lophophora in Mexico


    by Martin Terry

    Flora of the Dead Horse Mountains

    by Joselyn Fenstermacher






    All images © are copyrighted by the photographers and/or the CCI and are used with permission.
    Reproduction is forbidden without prior written consent.




    Cactus Conservation Institute