"albertii"A rare and endangered plant that is of great interest to us is presently saddled with a couple of names. E. reichenbachii var. albertii is the original name that Benson applied to it when he described it. Thanks to the more recent work of the German group Die Echinocereenfreunde (the friends of Echinocereus, Blum, Lange et al.), the synonym E. fitchii subsp. albertii is considered by Europeans to be the current correct name of the plant. Molecular study is ongoing to establish a better understanding of the relationships in this area. In the meantime it is handy (and unquestionably correct) to refer to all the populations of plants known as "albertii" as part of "the E. reichenbachii complex". It is noteworthy that USFWS people still use the original name given to the plant by Benson, primarily for the sake of continuity with the name under which the plant was listed as endangered under the ESA.
McMullen County We gratefully acknowledge permission granted by the Editor of Cactus World and by the author, for us to reproduce the following article for our readers: Berresford, Peter. 2011. The Black Lace Cactus -- an evaluation. We gratefully acknowledge permission granted by the Editor of
the Cactus
and Succulent Journal (U.S.), the Cactus and Succulent Society of
America, and the author, Lange, Michael J., and Sinclair, Jim. 2013. A hard-to-manage taxon: The Black Lace Cactus Echinocereus fitchii ssp. albertii. US F&W has produced two reports which are available online. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986. Black Lace Cactus (Echinocereus reichenbachii var. albertii) Recovery plan." ImagesKleberg County
McMullen County There is considerable variation in the few known populations. McMullen County For comparison: Echinocereus fitchiiAdditional images at CCI website Echinocereus reichenbachiiImages at CCI website |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|